|
|
Post by ridge on Feb 4, 2016 23:20:53 GMT -5
Doehead, if you want to yank someone's chain please do it on the issue and not on a personal level. You have plenty of good reasons for standing against MARs, use them. I would hate to call a nurse from the top of the mitt to check your blood pressure!   |
|
|
|
Post by ridge on Feb 4, 2016 23:58:48 GMT -5
This thread has become entirely too personal. I have deleted and edited until the cows come home or my fingers wear out. Perhaps it is time to lock this thread up and to start over with some specific MARs issue.
bnb, I was aware that the proposal said that the goal was advancing a buck's age by one year. Lately Bio has been proclaiming that it was about having more older mature bucks. In my book those are two very different things. Having more older mature bucks is bordering on trophy hunting if that is not what it is. I understood what you said. My question had to do with trying to get an accurate clarification from Bio. FYI, I don't believe that there is real substantive evidence to support the claim that MARs provides either one. As either fnf or you stated, all the survey does is state what the participants in the survey liked. That is truth. It does not provide any data that supports or denies the claims that MARs makes. Perhaps this is an area where the debate could continue in another thread. Sorry, I could not help but reply to your post.
|
|
