|
Post by QDM MARS on May 25, 2014 10:05:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by yesdeer on May 25, 2014 11:09:54 GMT -5
Awesome! Let's hope it goes through.
|
|
|
Post by ridge on May 26, 2014 19:12:07 GMT -5
I am so split on this one. That the wolf hunt is needed is obvious. That the NRC does not need more power or already has too much power is also obvious to me. If the legislature had any guts they would establish the wolf season on their own and not continue to give the NRC almost unlimited power. I will be surprised if the nuts, excuse me, the antis, do not file actions in court to try to get around the petitions.
|
|
|
Post by QDM MARS on May 26, 2014 21:35:49 GMT -5
I think they just did that last Thur. They called it a legal petition.....................I could not come up with just exactly what a legal petition means? ?
|
|
|
Post by ridge on Jun 4, 2014 22:21:02 GMT -5
I do not know what it is either, but I also heard about it.
A source that I do not have permission to quote also has informed me that some Detroit politicians will be introducing legislation that supposedly will change the make up of the NRC. That should grab the throats of a few MAPR folks that said there would be no reprisals by the antis. The trophy thing deer and wolf, real or not, has the antis in a frenzy and I believe they will go for broke this time. It has also been said that the antis may seek federal court action against several states at once because other states also have wolf hunts. I have absolutely no support for the antis but things could get down right interesting during the next 6 months to a year.
|
|
|
Post by QDM MARS on Jun 4, 2014 22:40:30 GMT -5
Hey Ridge
Are you free to share via a private message? I understand if not.
Here is the article about the legal petition submitted to the Natural Resource Commission by the anti group Keep Michigan Wolves Protected
|
|
|
Post by ridge on Jun 5, 2014 0:01:10 GMT -5
My Guess is that the NRC may look at it to appease the antis but I see no way that they will do anything with it. I will get back to you on the other, at least to what I know, by messaging.
|
|