What happenned Tony?

[Dale Malusi]

As posted on another website;


"Nutz, Never said, or even suggested, I wasn't going to buy license(s) this year. I said I wasn't going to buy licenses that I didn't intend to fill.
I have bought the combo tag ever since it came to be and only punched both halves with bucks once and only a couple of times did I use them both on antlerless. I pretty much assume that I will end the season with my restricted tag in my hip pocket, and I've done so happily to this point. I also typically end the season with an unused antlerless tag as well.
This year I will purchase the single buck tag and one antlerless tag @ $12.00 and I'll only buy additional antlerless tag(s) as needed to meet my management objectives.
Now....the possibility will still exist that I end the season with one or more tags in my pocket, but it won't be by design. We'll see."

You must be tired of wasting your time by now. Your crudeness at dealing with your fellow deerhunters has caught up with you. Never once have I said I would quit hunting, or even buy less tags if Maprs were enacted. Never.  You are showing your true colors by your poor sportsmanship. Suck it up bad boy. This is all about the health of the herd. As you have stated so many times. That train you were riding has pulled into the maintenance barn.
The jet has just taken off.

[Dale Malusi]

Her is another one, from a different poster;

"What? This topic united 80% of all hunters. It's has to me the most agreed upon regulation in the books. The majority came together and stood up against a very vocal small minority's of hunters. There's more neighbor participation and cooperation then ever. "


WE NEVER INITIATED ANYTHING FOR YOU TO DEFEND!!!!

You started it!

[Dale Malusi]

And another;

"Can't people on Facebook look at it without being a signed up member to any given group? I'm not on Facebook. I assumed there was lurkers, like here.

Either way, Smart will be up to like 60 by years end.

Better yet, they may just want to end the Smart forum, like the Concerned ended his, since the issue is "over" and the minority held off the uprising and still remains in control of the government."

Okay bob, stay off of our site then. If we are that insignificant, stay away. It is that simple. You like to state the differences in size, could that be phallic envy?

Get a life dude, get smart.

[jbrown]

Jul 19, 2017 8:56:45 GMT -5 Dale Malusi said:

And another;

"Can't people on Facebook look at it without being a signed up member to any given group? I'm not on Facebook. I assumed there was lurkers, like here.

Either way, Smart will be up to like 60 by years end.

Better yet, they may just want to end the Smart forum, like the Concerned ended his, since the issue is "over" and the minority held off the uprising and still remains in control of the government."

Okay bob, stay off of our site then. If we are that insignificant, stay away. It is that simple. You like to state the differences in size, could that be phallic envy?

Get a life dude, get smart.

so website participating memebers is 60??? I can intro you to dozens of site across the U.S. that have 1000's of members with the same 40 members squawking.. no differnt here

[hartman756]

so website participating memebers is 60??? I can intro you to dozens of site across the U.S. that have 1000's of members with the same 40 members squawking.. no differnt here

You got that right . One of the reasons I do not go to the MS forum any more is members like piny on there that post novel after novel hr after hr . The same novels he posted a decade ago on there . I sometimes think he just goes back to his old posts and copies and pastes them as though they are new thoughts. Couldn't stand reading his garbage back then and sure don't want to read it a second time. The vast majority of activity over there is only him any more .

[Dale Malusi]

It's not the size, it's how you use it. With the exception of one continuous schizophrenic poster ( notice I didn't say member), everyone gets along on this site.