Post by ridge on Mar 25, 2014 18:53:48 GMT -5
FERAL SWINE IN MICHIGAN
Michigan ban on exotic swine dismissed by U.P. judge; DNR appeal expected
Judge dismisses feral swine lawsuit between Michigan DNR and Missaukee County farmer
MLive story about Michigan farmer facing $700,000 in fines sparks feral swine debate among readers
Michigan farmer could face fines of $700,000 for violating swine order
Report: NY Times addresses feral pigs, citing Michigan's status and quoting Ted Nugent
TRAVERSE CITY, MI — A Michigan ban on Eurasian boars and similar exotic swine breeds is unconstitutional because it denies equal protection to owners of the animals and is so vague that it's hard to tell which the policy covers and which are exempt, a circuit judge said in a decision released Monday.
feral swine
Feral swine.
Courtesy of Michigan DNRE
Judge Thomas Solka's ruling applies only to sections of the Upper Peninsula that are home to three hog owners who fought the regulation, but courts elsewhere in Michigan could look to it if others challenge the ban.
Solka delayed his ruling from taking effect in expectation of an appeal by the Department of Natural Resources. Ed Golder, an agency spokesman, said it will consider appealing the ruling within the 21-day period allowed by law.
"It's unfortunate the court's ruling did not recognize the threat posed by Russian boar and the damage these animals can do to Michigan's natural and agricultural resources," Golder said.
Glen Smith, a Marquette attorney for two of the owners who sued, said they felt vindicated.
"It's been a long battle and they've been very uneasy about the efforts to enforce what they've always perceived to be an unfair regulatory action by the DNR," Smith said.
The rule, adopted in 2010, targets swine varieties commonly known as Eurasian or Russian boars, razorbacks or feral hogs, or hybrids exhibiting the same physical features. It labels them invasive species that are illegal to possess.
The DNR says those sharp-tusked hogs, which typically weigh 100-200 pounds but are sometimes larger, are escaping from farms and hunting ranches and damaging crops and the environment.
They are notorious for tearing up the ground when rooting for food, causing erosion and weakening plants. Their tendency to wallow in muddy shallows damages ponds and streams. The pork industry says exotic swine carry diseases that can spread to domestic livestock.
Dozens of operations in Michigan had such animals before the ban was imposed. Most have obeyed, but several filed legal challenges. A judge dismissed one suit last month after the DNR said the farmer, Mark Baker of Missaukee County, was in compliance even though Baker insisted he still possessed hybrids that could be considered off-limits under the policy.
He and others fighting the regulation say their hogs aren't escaping and contend that the DNR is favoring domestic hog producers who don't want competition.
Solka's opinion pertained to lawsuits filed by Greg Johnson, who owns the Bear Mountain hunting preserve in Marquette County; Roger Turunen, who raises Russian boars in Baraga County for sale to game ranches; and Matthew Tingstad of Gogebic County, who bought two boars from Turunen to keep as family pets.
The judge affirmed the DNR's authority to designate animals as invasive species and make it illegal to have them in the state. But he said in this case, the agency lacked a rational basis and didn't meet equal protection and due process standards under the Michigan and U.S. constitutions.
Even the DNR's experts acknowledged that domestic hogs also might have bodily features listed under the order as identifying invasive swine, such as coat coloration patterns and structure of ears, tails and the skeleton, the judge said.
"In short, at the risk of committing a felony, how is one to know whether a hybrid pig possessed by a farmer or game rancher ... is, or is not, in violation of the (order) and the statute?" Solka said.
The policy is intended to prevent hogs from running wild, but Johnson and Turunen presented evidence showing they were keeping their animals in secure enclosures, he said.
___
Follow John Flesher on Twitter at twitter.com/JohnFlesher
Related Stories
Judge dismisses feral swine lawsuit between Michigan DNR and Missaukee County farmer MLive story about Michigan farmer facing $700,000 in fines sparks feral swine debate among readers
Sign in with your MLive.com, Facebook or Google account or sign up
Please review the Community Rules before posting
Comments (9)
Shared (1)
Popular Topics
pause live updates
rationalbasis7 hours ago
Yeah, given the damage feral hogs can cause, there was clearly a rational basis for this regulation. The DNR should prevail on appeal.
2
LikeReplyShare
End of Line2 hours ago
Feral hogs are a problem, yes. They should be destroyed. Anyone who traps or harbors a feral hog should be fined and/or jailed. Feral hogs cause enormous damage.
Domestic hogs in a pen are not a problem regardless of their lineage, breeds that have been raised here for hundreds of years. It's laughable that the MDNR would define these breeds as "invasive" like the Asian Carp...but that's what they did...foolishly I might add.
Domestic hogs are considered the "property" of the farmer and by definition are not "feral." The argument is whether the DNR has the right to destroy/confiscate PROPERTY without due process. They do not. The appeal process will be an embarrassing one, and they will not prevail.
Read the ISO, read the list of the defining characteristics of the "banned species" and get back to me regarding "rational basis"
LikeReplyShare
Ann Arbor Dog Guy7 hours ago
These "secure enclosures" capable of holding hogs could be repurposed for securing nuclear waste, chemical weapons, leprechauns, and the unicorn. Every hog farmer learns that pigs can fly.
LikeReplyShare
djpuppy8 hours ago
Whew....when I first read the headline I thought they were going to move Deja Vu again.
LikeReplyShare
southbeagle9 hours ago
"The rule, adopted in 2010, targets swine varieties commonly known as Eurasian or Russian boars, razorbacks or feral hogs, or hybrids exhibiting the same physical features. It labels them invasive species that are illegal to possess."
Every single hog in America is an invasive species, all of them!
LikeReplyShare
K9Dude1 hour ago
Wait... Are you questioning the DNR's use of science?
LikeReplyShare
FlintBiMale9 hours ago
Im willing to bet that since the (conservative boogyman trigger word) DNR is involved and the destruction of the environment is involved, the right wing will favor the pigs and side with them over any environmental or property destruction. It always amazes me how those who act so outdoorsy could care less about the outdoors as long as they can rape it anyway they see fit.
3
LikeReplyShare
Skeeterboats10 hours ago
Surprised the DNR is fighting this. Just think if some could get loose there would actually be some game to hunt in the Eastern U.P. They could also be a good prey source for the wolves lol.
1
LikeReplyShare
End of Line10 hours ago
Please appeal, DNR. Please try to explain your ISO in front of a judge.
1
LikeReplyShare
Stay ahead of the weather
Check your local forecast and see weather news from across Michigan
... Find our coverage here»
Get the latest updates
Subscribe to our newsletters
Like MLive on Facebook
Follow MLive on Twitter
Most CommentsMost Read
1540 Live blog: Detroit Red Wings looking to keep home-ice streak alive, protect playoff spot
1118 Susan J. Demas: Rick Snyder's lost moment of leadership on gay marriage
564 Live blog: Detroit Pistons have one last chance to salvage something from forgettable road trip
510 Contraception use 'not your boss's business' says Michigan lawmaker on anti-discrimination bill
485 Red Wings recall forward Mitch Callahan from Grand Rapids; he could become eighth player to debut
See more comments »