Post by Dale Malusi on Sept 27, 2016 7:17:37 GMT -5
This has to be one of the most idiotic posts I have EVER read on the MSF site.
www.michigan-sportsman.com/forum/threads/the-study-that-the-anti-apr-guys-dont-want-you-to-see.574725/
It's about CWD. Not Mapr's.
So now the battle against CWD entails sustaining the battle for Mapr's and further dividing hunters. Cool.
It is has been obvious since I first took a stand against this stupid regulation push that I was a low-life scumbag to those pushing for them. They are an elite group that wants everyone to hunt like them. Imagine if everyone did, they'd be pushing for more stringent regulations. So it seems that the "anti-improvement" moniker is here to stay no matter the issue. ( TOO many antlerless permits. It's the anti-apr guys' fault!)
I am not pro CWD. I do not want it to spread. Nobody does. I could care less how it got here. It is time to throw this us/them BS out and actually try to show a united front in the battle to control this disease. It is not a time to further divide hunters with pointless banter. Nobody wants to see CWD in Michigan, but it is here and we have to deal with it. So what if Apr's are rescinded in the CWD area. If you are in the affected area and don't want to shoot each and every deer on sight, step back and let someone else do it, and hunt where there are Mapr's. It is that simple.
The bad part is Mapr's won't accomplish what the pushers want. Mapr's may or may not do what they are designed to do. They will not give every hunter a chance at a bigger, better deer, which is what the pushers want.. Their neighbors are still going to shoot them because 2 1/2 year old deer do not grow large enough antlers to stoke their egos. Therefore they will pass on the little 2 1/2 yr olds and wait for their trophy. The neighbor will get the meat.
I am a member of the ANTI-CWD crowd. Who's in?
www.michigan-sportsman.com/forum/threads/the-study-that-the-anti-apr-guys-dont-want-you-to-see.574725/
It's about CWD. Not Mapr's.
So now the battle against CWD entails sustaining the battle for Mapr's and further dividing hunters. Cool.
It is has been obvious since I first took a stand against this stupid regulation push that I was a low-life scumbag to those pushing for them. They are an elite group that wants everyone to hunt like them. Imagine if everyone did, they'd be pushing for more stringent regulations. So it seems that the "anti-improvement" moniker is here to stay no matter the issue. ( TOO many antlerless permits. It's the anti-apr guys' fault!)
I am not pro CWD. I do not want it to spread. Nobody does. I could care less how it got here. It is time to throw this us/them BS out and actually try to show a united front in the battle to control this disease. It is not a time to further divide hunters with pointless banter. Nobody wants to see CWD in Michigan, but it is here and we have to deal with it. So what if Apr's are rescinded in the CWD area. If you are in the affected area and don't want to shoot each and every deer on sight, step back and let someone else do it, and hunt where there are Mapr's. It is that simple.
The bad part is Mapr's won't accomplish what the pushers want. Mapr's may or may not do what they are designed to do. They will not give every hunter a chance at a bigger, better deer, which is what the pushers want.. Their neighbors are still going to shoot them because 2 1/2 year old deer do not grow large enough antlers to stoke their egos. Therefore they will pass on the little 2 1/2 yr olds and wait for their trophy. The neighbor will get the meat.
I am a member of the ANTI-CWD crowd. Who's in?