|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 17, 2016 9:14:03 GMT -5
Supposedly the Limpd's have inside connections and have posted on their FB page graphs containing percentages of the harvest.
So what.
Any first grader could tell you the harvest percentages would show an older harvest. Why just show a portion of the data? How about actual numbers?
Surely there must be some raw numbers or else we would not have percentages.
Manipulating data seems to be how you get things done with this crowd. As long as it looks good on paper.
The best part is the main players are ecstatic. Their followers will soon get in line.
If all it took was manipulated data to satisfy the bulk of them, why didn't we just change the way we gather data? It would have saved some people a lot of money.
Those pushing for more restrictions will never be satisfied until they get what they want. They will probably get it too. A beaver can take down a tree without tools if he keeps at it long enough.
When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted, they will be.
Think about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 13:24:00 GMT -5
Supposedly the Limpd's have inside connections and have posted on their FB page graphs containing percentages of the harvest. So what. Any first grader could tell you the harvest percentages would show an older harvest. Why just show a portion of the data? How about actual numbers? Surely there must be some raw numbers or else we would not have percentages. Manipulating data seems to be how you get things done with this crowd. As long as it looks good on paper. The best part is the main players are ecstatic. Their followers will soon get in line. If all it took was manipulated data to satisfy the bulk of them, why didn't we just change the way we gather data? It would have saved some people a lot of money. Those pushing for more restrictions will never be satisfied until they get what they want. They will probably get it too. A beaver can take down a tree without tools if he keeps at it long enough. When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted, they will be. Think about it. You are correct. When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted they will be. The ball never stopped rolling in that direction. Get out of the way the MAPR train is making a trail and picking up steam. You'll get to enjoy the new regulations soon. You might want to start hunting in Meridian township if you want to avoid them. |
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 17, 2016 13:56:55 GMT -5
Supposedly the Limpd's have inside connections and have posted on their FB page graphs containing percentages of the harvest. So what. Any first grader could tell you the harvest percentages would show an older harvest. Why just show a portion of the data? How about actual numbers? Surely there must be some raw numbers or else we would not have percentages. Manipulating data seems to be how you get things done with this crowd. As long as it looks good on paper. The best part is the main players are ecstatic. Their followers will soon get in line. If all it took was manipulated data to satisfy the bulk of them, why didn't we just change the way we gather data? It would have saved some people a lot of money. Those pushing for more restrictions will never be satisfied until they get what they want. They will probably get it too. A beaver can take down a tree without tools if he keeps at it long enough. When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted, they will be. Think about it. You are correct. When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted they will be. The ball never stopped rolling in that direction. Get out of the way the MAPR train is making a trail and picking up steam. You'll get to enjoy the new regulations soon. You might want to start hunting in Meridian township if you want to avoid them.
Uh..the last two proposals were turned down. |
|
|
|
Post by hartman756 on Mar 17, 2016 14:48:19 GMT -5
No they don't have inside connections , I explained those numbers and where they come from and why they are fake ( where you are able to read it ,you know where to look ) .
|
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 15:39:57 GMT -5
You are correct. When the majority of Michigan hunters want to be restricted they will be. The ball never stopped rolling in that direction. Get out of the way the MAPR train is making a trail and picking up steam. You'll get to enjoy the new regulations soon. You might want to start hunting in Meridian township if you want to avoid them.
Uh..the last two proposals were turned down. Yep they sure were. But did they break 50% support for? Yep they sure did. Did they increase % for from 10 years ago?yep they sure did.....by like 20% more. 10 years ago they failed horribly. 5 years ago they failed barely. My guess is they will pass with flying colors in the NW12. My guess the next proposal will pass and pass again. The only thing in the way will be CWD. Now I know you don't want CWD just to stop aprs. |
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 15:42:00 GMT -5
No they don't have inside connections , I explained those numbers and where they come from and why they are fake ( where you are able to read it ,you know where to look ) . Finally. Someone realizes we don't have inside connections. What we do have is a great relationship with the DNR. Probably because we try to work with them rather than against them. |
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 17, 2016 15:54:12 GMT -5
The best part is the main players are ecstatic. Their followers will soon get in line.
Uh..the last two proposals were turned down. Yep they sure were. But did they break 50% support for? Yep they sure did. Did they increase % for from 10 years ago?yep they sure did.....by like 20% more. 10 years ago they failed horribly. 5 years ago they failed barely. My guess is they will pass with flying colors in the NW12. My guess the next proposal will pass and pass again. The only thing in the way will be CWD. Now I know you don't want CWD just to stop aprs. Keep guessing. I'm guessing there won't even be a new proposal put in front of the NRC until their little study is concluded. Then it won't matter what any special interest group thinks. But that is an educated guess. |
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 16:11:57 GMT -5
Yep they sure were. But did they break 50% support for? Yep they sure did. Did they increase % for from 10 years ago?yep they sure did.....by like 20% more. 10 years ago they failed horribly. 5 years ago they failed barely. My guess is they will pass with flying colors in the NW12. My guess the next proposal will pass and pass again. The only thing in the way will be CWD. Now I know you don't want CWD just to stop aprs. Keep guessing. I'm guessing there won't even be a new proposal put in front of the NRC until their little study is concluded. Then it won't matter what any special interest group thinks. But that is an educated guess. Really..... There won't be? Lol..... You should get out more. |
|
|
|
Post by daappleknocker on Mar 17, 2016 16:14:21 GMT -5
Please go to the Facebook page, stop mandatory antler restrictions today. I have posted two things there and I think I have them running scared. Chris or Dennis if you can find a place for them over here and they meet with your approval please post them here. |
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 16:23:40 GMT -5
Please go to the Facebook page, stop mandatory antler restrictions today. I have posted two things there and I think I have them running scared. Chris or Dennis if you can find a place for them over here and they meet with your approval please post them here. There is nothing on your Facebook page that scares us. ..NOTHING. Change is coming bro.... |
|
|
|
Post by daappleknocker on Mar 17, 2016 17:01:01 GMT -5
Change is coming....get ready for the repeal of ALL MAR's statewide! Sooner than you think. |
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 17, 2016 18:37:40 GMT -5
Change is coming....get ready for the repeal of ALL MAR's statewide! Sooner than you think. Lol. That's good stuff you're smoking. |
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 17, 2016 19:14:15 GMT -5
The best part is the main players are ecstatic. Their followers will soon get in line.
Right Pascal?
Mr Big starts off with his claims, then the followers get in line and defend his every word. Then he gets caught fudging the truth. Spin, attack and belittle.
LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 18, 2016 7:06:42 GMT -5
That's what I thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by hartman756 on Mar 18, 2016 10:08:24 GMT -5
Go ahead and post them where you want them to be 
|
|
|
|
Post by bucksnbows on Mar 18, 2016 10:20:38 GMT -5
Lol...
I should be a fisherman.
The suckers are running good today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 18, 2016 11:06:08 GMT -5
Lol... I should be a fisherman. The suckers are running good today. Yup they sure are. I AM a fisherman. They were running better yesterday. LOL :o |
|
|
|
Post by Dale Malusi on Mar 20, 2016 14:59:09 GMT -5
It's funny how an "anonymous" internet poster on the MSF site went from this;
I see the 2015 check station data is out.
I can't post the pdf file from my phone.
Anyone logged in who can?
Looks very good age wise for the NW13
To this;
After looking at those links I don't think I can believe the check station data.
LOL! Even the staunchest Mapr supporter is starting to see that the good Dr is full of excrement.
|
|
